From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lediard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 1985
115 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

December 9, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bonomo, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

As defendant was being arrested a police officer asked "where is the gun?". Defendant replied that he had no gun; "it was a pipe". Under the circumstances of this case, this statement was properly admitted as a response to a question the police properly asked in order to clarify a situation and protect themselves (see, People v Johnson, 86 A.D.2d 165, 168, affd 59 N.Y.2d 1014).

We find that the evidence was sufficient to prove defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. We have reviewed defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Lazer, J.P., Thompson, Weinstein and Niehoff, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lediard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 9, 1985
115 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Lediard

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM LEDIARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 9, 1985

Citations

115 A.D.2d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Holland

A police officer may ask questions, without first administering Miranda rights, to clarify a situation and to…