From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Leazer

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jan 15, 2020
179 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2018–08782

01-15-2020

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Anthony LEAZER, appellant.

Charles E. Holster III, Garden City, NY, for appellant. Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Jason R. Richards and Rebecca L. Abensur of counsel), for respondent.


Charles E. Holster III, Garden City, NY, for appellant.

Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Jason R. Richards and Rebecca L. Abensur of counsel), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, ROBERT J. MILLER, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Teresa K. Corrigan, J.), dated May 30, 2018, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We agree with the Supreme Court's determination granting the People's request for an upward departure from the presumptive risk level two designation, to risk level three (see People v. Amin, 128 A.D.3d 785, 9 N.Y.S.3d 158 ). The People established, by clear and convincing evidence, the existence of aggravating factors not adequately taken into account by the Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary (2006) (hereinafter Guidelines) and the risk assessment instrument (see Guidelines at 4) warranting an upward departure from the defendant's presumptive risk level, including a series of concurrent crimes that involved violent robberies of prostitutes, during which the defendant threatened to kill his victims and forced his victims to disrobe (see People v. Headwell, 156 A.D.3d 1263, 66 N.Y.S.3d 580 ; People v. Duryee, 130 A.D.3d 1487, 1488, 12 N.Y.S.3d 731 ; People v. Amin, 128 A.D.3d 785 ; People v. Faulkner, 122 A.D.3d 539, 997 N.Y.S.2d 410 ; People v. Frosch, 69 A.D.3d 699, 893 N.Y.S.2d 226 ).

MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Leazer

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Jan 15, 2020
179 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Leazer

Case Details

Full title:People of State of New York, respondent, v. Anthony Leazer, appellant…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Jan 15, 2020

Citations

179 A.D.3d 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
113 N.Y.S.3d 884
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 313

Citing Cases

People v. Songster

The People demonstrated, by clear and convincing evidence, that there were aggravating factors not adequately…

People v. Songster

The People demonstrated, by clear and convincing evidence, that there were aggravating factors not adequately…