This in no way amounted to a resentencing with respect to the conviction of assault in the first degree and did not afford defendant an additional opportunity to appeal (see CPL 450.30, 460.10 ). Simply put, appellate review of defendant's challenge to his status as a youthful offender in connection with his conviction of assault in the first degree "was waived by [his] failure to raise [such] issue on his initial appeal" ( People v. Leacock , 237 A.D.2d 306, 306, 655 N.Y.S.2d 394 [1997], lv denied 89 N.Y.2d 1096, 660 N.Y.S.2d 390, 682 N.E.2d 991 [1997] ; seePeople v. Harrington , 14 A.D.3d 944, 945, 788 N.Y.S.2d 622 [2005], lv denied 4 N.Y.3d 887, 798 N.Y.S.2d 732, 831 N.E.2d 977 [2005] ; People v. Winslow, 36 A.D.2d 997, 998, 321 N.Y.S.2d 722 [1971] ). The other crime to which defendant pleaded guilty was committed after defendant was 19 years old and, therefore, youthful offender consideration was inapplicable.