Summary
In People v. Leach (146 N.Y. 392, 396) it was said: "That he [the court] should have commented upon the evidence, and, perhaps in some expressions, have indicated the bent of his own mind, is not a subject for adverse criticism so long as he did not invade the province of the jury and withdraw from them the consideration of any facts, or lead them to suppose that their determination was not wholly with them."
Summary of this case from People v. StiglinOpinion
Argued May 21, 1895
Decided June 4, 1895
Hugh O. Pentecost for appellant.
John D. Lindsay for respondent.
GRAY, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.