From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lawton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 15, 1990
159 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

March 15, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Fred Eggert, J.).


The evidence adduced at trial reveals that on May 27, 1986, defendant hid in the shower of his ex-girlfriend's apartment, which he had ceased sharing with her eight months earlier, and brutally attacked her with a hammer. The victim, who suffered a fractured cheekbone and various lacerations to her head, as well as a neighbor, who looked out her window and observed the attack, both unequivocally identified defendant.

In failing to make the appropriate CPL 440.10 motion to vacate the judgment on the ground of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, defendant has denied this court the opportunity to consider additional background facts which might have been developed (People v Bennett, 157 A.D.2d 630). In any event, defendant has failed to demonstrate that he received less than competent assistance of counsel (see, People v Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137).

Trial counsel's failure to make a suppression motion does not by itself establish ineffective assistance of counsel (People v Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 709). Defendant had no expectation of privacy in complainant's apartment, a predicate for standing to suppress the library book which was recovered inside the bathtub (see, People v Rodriguez, 69 N.Y.2d 159). Moreover, this book was found by complainant's niece, a private citizen, hence no Fourth Amendment considerations are implicated (People v Adler, 50 N.Y.2d 730, 737, cert denied 449 U.S. 1014). Defense counsel's introduction into evidence of a small hammer for demonstrative purposes and his summation were part of a trial strategy aimed at minimizing the serious nature of the instant crime. Counsel's failure to call other alibi witnesses or subpoena certain telephone calls is not demonstrable on this record (see, People v Ogelsby, 128 A.D.2d 556). In any event, counsel did attempt to furnish a competent alibi defense through the testimony of defendant's supervisor and a co-worker.

We have considered defendant's other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Ross, Asch and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Lawton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 15, 1990
159 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Lawton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LAROI LAWTON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 15, 1990

Citations

159 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
552 N.Y.S.2d 580

Citing Cases

People v. Jackson

Before: Buckley, P.J., Tom, Rosenberger, Ellerin, Williams, JJ. The court properly denied defendant's motion…

People v. Buckley

, People v. Green, 156 A.D.2d 465, lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 813). Defendant has denied this Court the opportunity…