From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Laws

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 27, 1995
216 A.D.2d 180 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 27, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Irene Duffy, J.).


The verdict was neither based on insufficient evidence nor was it against the weight of the evidence and the prosecution met its burden of proving that defendant knew he possessed an aggregate weight of four ounces of cocaine, through evidence that defendant had handled the substance which weighed over six ounces ( People v. Ryan, 82 N.Y.2d 497, 505), thus permitting the jury to draw the rational inference that defendant knew the quantity of the drugs he possessed ( see, People v. Reisman, 29 N.Y.2d 278, 285-288, cert denied 405 U.S. 1041).

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Laws

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 27, 1995
216 A.D.2d 180 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Laws

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TYESE LAWS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 27, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 180 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
628 N.Y.S.2d 677

Citing Cases

People v. Barry

Needless to say, it would be quite difficult for a grand or petit juror to infer knowledge of the statutory…