The evidence presented, including the defendant's admission at trial, demonstrate that his acts constituted a single criminal endeavor with the same purpose, and were closely related and connected in time and circumstance of commission. Thus, these charges were properly tried together ( see, CPL 40.10, 200.20 Crim. Proc.; People v. Johnson, 48 N.Y.2d 925; People v. Gallishaw, 143 A.D.2d 198; People v. Lawrence, 166 A.D.2d 164). The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.
The warrants described the locations to be searched with sufficient particularity. People v. Nieves, 36 N.Y.2d 396, 401 (1975); People v. Gramson, 50 AD3d 294 (1st Dept.), lv. den.11 NY3d 832 (2008)(place only); People v. Lawrence, 166 A.D.2d 164 (1st Dept.1990), lv. den.77 N.Y.2d 879 (1991). Likewise, the items to be seized were described with sufficient particularity, and the list of those items was not overbroad.