From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. LaRocco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

November 26, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (O'Dwyer, J.).


Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.

We find no merit to the defendant's contention that the People failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the element of forcible compulsion necessary to sustain the convictions for sodomy in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree as charged in indictment No. 4182/86 (see, Penal Law § 130.00; § 130.50 [1]; § 130.65 [1]). The complainant's testimony indicates that while assisting with her disabled vehicle the defendant drove the vehicle to a dark and deserted area under an underpass of the Grand Central Parkway near Shea Stadium. The complainant became very afraid, got out of the car and told the defendant she wanted to drive. At that point, the defendant grabbed the complainant by both arms, pushed her against the car and struggled with her until she fell on the ground with the defendant on top of her. The complainant testified that she became "petrified" and pleaded with the defendant to let her go. The defendant then told the complainant "If you don't put up a fight, I won't force you". The defendant then engaged in various sexual acts with the complainant. From these facts, the jury could reasonably infer that the threat of harm implicit in the defendant's behavior placed the complainant in fear of suffering a physical injury if she did not comply with his demands (see, People v. Thompson, 72 N.Y.2d 410, 413; People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495). "The proper focus is on the state of mind produced in the victim by the defendant's conduct" (People v. Thompson, supra, at 416). The complainant testified that she had not consented to the defendant's acts but submitted because of her fear. Accordingly, the People have met their burden of proof (see, People v. Coleman, 42 N.Y.2d 500; People v. Gonzalez, 136 A.D.2d 735). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15). Thompson, J.P., Brown, Eiber and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. LaRocco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 1990
167 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. LaRocco

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY LaROCCO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 1990

Citations

167 A.D.2d 557 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 228

Citing Cases

People v. Warren

Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against…

People v. Sweezey

"[T]he inquiry required in determining whether threats amount to forcible compulsion is not what the…