People v. Lara

Full title: THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALBERT SALINAS LARA, Defendant…

Court: COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX

Date published: Mar 27, 2017

2d Crim. No. B276762 (Cal. Ct. App. Mar. 27, 2017)

Opinion

2d Crim. No. B276762

03-27-2017

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALBERT SALINAS LARA, Defendant and Appellant.

Linda L. Currey, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

TANGEMAN, J.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. (Super. Ct. No. 2015025007)
(Ventura County)

Albert Salinas Lara was charged in a felony information with one felony count of possession of a slungshot (Pen. Code, § 22210),¹ one misdemeanor count of petty theft (§ 484, subd. (a)), one misdemeanor count of possession of a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)), one misdemeanor count of possession of drug paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364, subd. (a)), and one misdemeanor count of trespass (§ 602, subd. (m)). He was convicted by jury of all misdemeanor counts. The jury was unable to reach a verdict on the felony count, which was later dismissed by the court pursuant to section 1385. Lara was sentenced to serve 365 days with presentence credits of 365 days. He filed a timely appeal.

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise stated. --------

We appointed counsel to represent Lara on appeal. After counsel's examination of the record, she filed an opening brief raising no issues.

On January 20, 2017, we advised Lara by mail that he had 30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We received no response.

We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that Lara's attorney has fully complied with her responsibilities and that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.

TANGEMAN, J. We concur:

GILBERT, P. J.

PERREN, J.

David M. Hirsch, Judge

Superior Court County of Ventura

Linda L. Currey, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.