From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lantz

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jan 4, 2022
968 N.W.2d 544 (Mich. 2022)

Opinion

SC: 161057 COA: 351549

01-04-2022

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Ray LANTZ, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2020 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the defendant's convictions for failure to comply with the Sex Offenders Registration Act, MCL 28.721 et seq. The retroactive application of 2011 PA 17 to the defendant, well after the 1984 and 1992 convictions that required him to register, violates the federal and state constitutional prohibitions on ex post facto laws. People v. Betts , 507 Mich. 527, ––– N.W.2d –––– (2021). We REMAND this case to the Washtenaw Circuit Court for further proceedings consistent with Betts . In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

People v. Lantz

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Jan 4, 2022
968 N.W.2d 544 (Mich. 2022)
Case details for

People v. Lantz

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jack Ray LANTZ…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Jan 4, 2022

Citations

968 N.W.2d 544 (Mich. 2022)