From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lanterman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1993
194 A.D.2d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

June 7, 1993

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.).


Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the court failed to sentence him in accordance with its sentencing promise is not preserved for appellate review since the defendant neither moved to vacate the plea nor protested the sentence (see, People v. Maybeck, 157 A.D.2d 861; People v. Ifill, 108 A.D.2d 202) and we decline to reach this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.

In addition, the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive. Thompson, J.P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lanterman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 7, 1993
194 A.D.2d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Lanterman

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RICHARD LANTERMAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1993

Citations

194 A.D.2d 630 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
599 N.Y.S.2d 994

Citing Cases

People v. Naglieri

The defendant's claim that the court improperly imposed a sentence greater than the one promised in the plea…

People v. Bethea

On appeal, the defendant argues that the court's imposition of a "victim witness fee" and a "penalty…