Opinion
April 23, 1996
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, Jeffrey Atlas, J., Herbert Altman, J.
Defendant's motion to suppress statements was properly denied. The record fails to support defendant's claim that her statements were the product of continuous police interrogation for a period of almost 12 hours. On the contrary, during this period of time, defendant was offered food and drink and there was a break of several hours between the making of written and videotaped statements ( compare, People v. Anderson, 42 N.Y.2d 35). Nor was there anything defective about the Miranda warnings and waivers ( see, People v. Dunwoody, 89 A.D.2d 569, 570). We see no reason to reduce defendant's bargained-for sentence.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Ellerin, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.