From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Landy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 10, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-05-10

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Moses LANDY, Appellant.

Brian M. Callahan, Schenectady, for appellant. Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Gerald A. Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.


Brian M. Callahan, Schenectady, for appellant. Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Gerald A. Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.

Before: PETERS, P.J., MERCURE, ROSE, LAHTINEN and EGAN JR., JJ.

ROSE, J.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Schenectady County (Drago, J.), entered October 13, 2010, which denied defendant's motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46.

In 1997, defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and was thereafter sentenced to an aggregate prison term of 8 to 16 years. In 2009, while on parole, defendant violated the terms of his parole and was reincarcerated. Defendant thereafter moved for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46. County Court denied the motion on the basis that defendant was ineligible to apply for resentencing because he had violated parole. Defendant now appeals.

We reverse. Defendant's status as a reincarcerated parole violator does not render him ineligible for resentencing as a matter of law ( see People v. Paulin, 17 N.Y.3d 238, 244, 929 N.Y.S.2d 36, 952 N.E.2d 1028 [2011] ), although it may be taken into consideration in determining whether or not to grant his application ( see People v. Chaires, 89 A.D.3d 1282, 1282, 932 N.Y.S.2d 736 [2011]; People v. Chatham, 88 A.D.3d 1063, 1064, 931 N.Y.S.2d 538 [2011] ). Accordingly, the order must be reversed and the matter remitted to County Court for further proceedings.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, and matter remitted to the County Court of Schenectady County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.

PETERS, P.J., MERCURE, LAHTINEN and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Landy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
May 10, 2012
95 A.D.3d 1448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

People v. Landy

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Moses LANDY, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: May 10, 2012

Citations

95 A.D.3d 1448 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3682
943 N.Y.S.2d 691

Citing Cases

People v. Scott

As the People concede, reversal is required. Although defendant's status as a parole violator is to be…

People v. Backman

This appeal ensued. Regardless of the People's concession that defendant's status as a reincarcerated parole…