Opinion
December 14, 1987
Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Patsalos, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved the issue of the propriety of his plea bargain for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636).
Contrary to the defendant's contention, a review of the record demonstrates that no condition that he undergo or continue sex-offender drug treatment was imposed at the time of sentencing. Rather, the defendant received the sentence for which he had bargained (see, People v Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816) which was the minimum indeterminate term of imprisonment permissible (see, Penal Law § 70.02 [a]; [3] [b]; [4]). Mangano, J.P., Brown, Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.