From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 2001
284 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted May 21, 2001

June 18, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Fisher, J.), rendered December 17, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Andrew C. Fine, New York, N.Y. (Beth S. Lyons of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Alyson J. Gill, and Stephen B. Selbst of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly admitted limited expert testimony concerning the general practices of drug dealers (see, People v. Smalls, 266 A.D.2d 570; People v. Kane, 207 A.D.2d 846, affd sub nom. People v. Graves, 85 N.Y.2d 1024).

SANTUCCI, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, H. MILLER and CRANE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Lall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 18, 2001
284 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Lall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. RAM LALL, A/K/A BAHADUR BOODRAM, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 18, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 868

Citing Cases

LALL v. BURGE

Lall argued that this error deprived him of his right to a fair trial and suggested that he had employed a…