From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ladisky

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Dec 27, 2023
No. 367752 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 27, 2023)

Opinion

367752

12-27-2023

People of Michigan v. Dustin Charles Ladisky


LC No. 2022-018509-FC

Douglas B. Shapiro, James Robert Redford Judges.

ORDER

KATHLEEN A. FEENEY PRESIDING JUDGE.

The motion to withdraw is GRANTED, because the Court finds, after a full examination of all the proceedings, that the appeal is wholly frivolous.

The defendant-appellant's application for leave to appeal therefore is DENIED. Withdrawing counsel shall mail by first-class mail to defendant-appellant within 14 days of the date of certification of this order a copy of this order and the transcript(s) and file proof of that service with the Clerk of this Court as required by MCR 7.211(C)(5)(d). Counsel is hereby notified that this Court may vacate this order granting the motion to withdraw if counsel fails to serve the transcript(s) on defendant appellant.

The order denying leave to appeal is STAYED for a period of 28 days after service of a copy of the transcript(s) on defendant-appellant, within which period defendant-appellant may, if desired, file a written communication with this Court, raising any issue or question for this Court to consider. Any such communication shall be treated by this Court as a motion for reconsideration.


Summaries of

People v. Ladisky

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Dec 27, 2023
No. 367752 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 27, 2023)
Case details for

People v. Ladisky

Case Details

Full title:People of Michigan v. Dustin Charles Ladisky

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: Dec 27, 2023

Citations

No. 367752 (Mich. Ct. App. Dec. 27, 2023)