From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lacosse

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 23, 2016
499 Mich. 873 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 150447. COA No. 310987.

03-23-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Stephen Allen LACOSSE, II, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 16, 2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Livingston Circuit Court to determine whether it took the challenged information regarding the defendant's parents in the PSIR into account at sentencing. If the court determines that the challenged information was either inaccurate or irrelevant to the defendant's sentence, the court shall direct the probation officer to correct or delete the challenged information from the PSIR as required by MCR 6.425(E)(2)(a) and assure that a corrected copy of the report is prepared and transmitted to the Michigan Department of Corrections per MCR 6.425 and MCL 771.14(6). In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.


Summaries of

People v. Lacosse

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 23, 2016
499 Mich. 873 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Lacosse

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Stephen Allen…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Mar 23, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 873 (Mich. 2016)
876 N.W.2d 242

Citing Cases

People v. Henry

The court must state on the record whether it finds the information inaccurate or, if uncertain about the…