From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lacefield

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division
Dec 20, 2007
No. B191217 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2007)

Opinion


Page 1174c

157 Cal.App.4th 1174c __ Cal.Rptr.3d__ THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ERICK DARNELL LACEFIELD, Defendant and Appellant. B191217 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Eighth Division December 20, 2007

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. YA 063189

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

THE COURT

The opinion herein, filed on November 28, 2007, (157 Cal.App.4th 249; __ Cal.Rptr.3d __), is modified as follows:

1. On page 2 [157 Cal.App.4th 251, advance report, 1st full par., line 9], line 8, “section 69” is substituted for “section 148(a)(1).”

2. On page 6 [157 Cal.App.4th 255, advance report, 3d full par., line 12], line 20, the word “which” is substituted for the word “that.”

3. On page 9 [157 Cal.App.4th 257, advance report, 5th full par., line 3], line 14, “section 148(a)(1)” is substituted for “section 69.”

4. On page 9 [157 Cal.App.4th 257, advance report, 5th full par., line 3], line 15, “section 69” is substituted for “section 148(a)(1).”

5. On the final line of page 10 [157 Cal.App.4th 259, advance report 1st par., line 5], the word “which” is substituted for the word “that.”

6. On page 14 [157 Cal.App.4th 262, advance report, 4th full par., line 3], line 23, add the word “but” before the phrase “there was no unlawful use of force.”

There is no change in judgment.


Summaries of

People v. Lacefield

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division
Dec 20, 2007
No. B191217 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2007)
Case details for

People v. Lacefield

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ERICK DARNELL LACEFIELD…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division

Date published: Dec 20, 2007

Citations

No. B191217 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2007)