From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Lacart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1997
235 A.D.2d 291 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

January 21, 1997.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Mary McGowan Davis, J., at speedy trial motion; Frederic Berman, J., at plea and sentence), rendered July 12, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his guilty plea, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before: Wallach, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


Defendant's constitutional speedy trial motion was properly denied. Although labeled as a motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground of, inter alia, constitutional violations of defendant's right to a speedy trial, the motion failed to address the constitutional issues ( see, People v Lomax, 50 NY2d 351). Defendant failed to preserve his present claims, and failed to develop a factual record sufficient to establish the merits of such claims ( People v Charleston, 54 NY2d 622). In any event, were this Court to review the constitutional issue on the present record, we would find it to be without merit ( People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442).


Summaries of

People v. Lacart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1997
235 A.D.2d 291 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Lacart

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VICTOR LACART, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1997

Citations

235 A.D.2d 291 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
652 N.Y.S.2d 707

Citing Cases

People v. Rowe

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Moore and Steven Barrett, JJ., at speedy trial proceedings;…

People v. Love

Although labeled as motions to dismiss the indictment on constitutional speedy trial grounds, neither…