From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Laboy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 20, 2017
59 N.Y.S.3d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

09-20-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Angel LABOY, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY, for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and William H. Branigan of counsel; Deanna Russo on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, NY, for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and William H. Branigan of counsel; Deanna Russo on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme

Court, Queens County (Chin Brandt, J.), imposed May 5, 2016, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Brown, 122 A.D.3d 133, 137, 992 N.Y.S.2d 297 ; People v. Johnson, 109 A.D.3d 1004, 971 N.Y.S.2d 469 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, contrary to the defendant's contention, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., MASTRO, MILLER, LaSALLE and BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Laboy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Sep 20, 2017
59 N.Y.S.3d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Laboy

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Angel LABOY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 20, 2017

Citations

59 N.Y.S.3d 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)