From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. La Mar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 24, 1986
116 A.D.2d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

January 24, 1986

Appeal from the Niagara County Court, Hannigan, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Denman, Boomer, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Although the trial court exceeded the bounds of permissible questioning of defendant's witnesses (see, People v Mees, 47 N.Y.2d 997, 998; People v Mendes, 3 N.Y.2d 120, 121), defense counsel failed to preserve this issue for our review as a matter of law (see, People v Charleston, 56 N.Y.2d 886). Nor did he preserve for such review any error committed by the sentencing court (see, People v Green, 54 N.Y.2d 878). On this record, we decline to exercise our discretion either to reverse the conviction or to remand for resentencing.


Summaries of

People v. La Mar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 24, 1986
116 A.D.2d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. La Mar

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES LA MAR…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1986

Citations

116 A.D.2d 1003 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)