Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA347805
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein March 30, 2011, is modified as follows:
1. The third sentence in the “Discussion” portion of the opinion, on page 4, is modified to read:
The defense objected to the admission of Murray’s testimony on the ground that although the analysis and comparison of the DNA from the toothbrush, carpet, and bone samples were done by Murray, the testifying witness, as to each of those samples one or more of the steps preliminary to that analysis and comparison (the extraction and/or quantification steps) had been done by someone at Bode Technology other than Murray.
2. The first sentence of the second full paragraph on page 9 of the opinion is modified to read:
Nothing before the trial court suggests that the results of Murray’s analysis of the various DNA profiles could have been affected by the extraction or quantification procedures that other analysts had used in order to prepare the DNA profiles that Murray analyzed and compared. In response to questioning by Kwon’s counsel, Murray testified that the outcome of the quantification step could not affect the results of her analysis; she was not asked about the other steps in the process.
There is no change in the judgment.
Appellant’s petition for rehearing filed April 11, 2011 is denied.
MALLANO, P. J., CHANEY, J., ROTHSCHILD, J.