People v. Konrad

1 Citing case

  1. People v. Williams

    69 Misc. 3d 146 (N.Y. App. Term 2020)

    Here, viewing the elements of the offenses as charged to the jury, we find that the verdicts acquitting defendant of petit larceny but convicting her of endangering the welfare of a child and criminal contempt in the second degree were not repugnant. The elements of petit larceny as charged are completely different from the elements of endangering the welfare of a child and criminal contempt in the second degree as charged (seePeople v. Gardner , 164 AD3d 602, 602 [2018] ; People v. Vazquez , 82 AD3d 1273, 1275 [2011] ; People v. Dominique , 36 AD3d 624, 625 [2007] ; People v. Konrad , 13 Misc 3d 135[A], 2006 NY Slip Op. 52037[U] [App. Term, 2d Dept., 9th & 10th Jud. Dists 2006] ).