Here, viewing the elements of the offenses as charged to the jury, we find that the verdicts acquitting defendant of petit larceny but convicting her of endangering the welfare of a child and criminal contempt in the second degree were not repugnant. The elements of petit larceny as charged are completely different from the elements of endangering the welfare of a child and criminal contempt in the second degree as charged (seePeople v. Gardner , 164 AD3d 602, 602 [2018] ; People v. Vazquez , 82 AD3d 1273, 1275 [2011] ; People v. Dominique , 36 AD3d 624, 625 [2007] ; People v. Konrad , 13 Misc 3d 135[A], 2006 NY Slip Op. 52037[U] [App. Term, 2d Dept., 9th & 10th Jud. Dists 2006] ).