From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Koehl

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 28, 2013
109 A.D.3d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-08-28

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Edward KOEHL, appellant.

Edward Koehl, Stormville, N.Y., appellant pro se. Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Anne Grady of counsel), for respondent.


Edward Koehl, Stormville, N.Y., appellant pro se. Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Anne Grady of counsel), for respondent.
Sally Wasserman, New York, N.Y., former appellate counsel.

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 28, 1999 ( People v. Koehl, 262 A.D.2d 659, 691 N.Y.S.2d 896), affirming two judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, both rendered April 5, 1994.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel ( see Jones v. Barnes, 463 U.S. 745, 103 S.Ct. 3308, 77 L.Ed.2d 987;People v. Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277, 778 N.Y.S.2d 431, 810 N.E.2d 883).

ANGIOLILLO, J.P., DICKERSON, SGROI and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Koehl

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 28, 2013
109 A.D.3d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Koehl

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Edward KOEHL, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 28, 2013

Citations

109 A.D.3d 668 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 5759
970 N.Y.S.2d 882