Opinion
365 CA 17–01306
03-16-2018
SIMON K. MOODY, AUBURN, FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT. JON E. BUDELMANN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (AMANDA L. CASSELMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
SIMON K. MOODY, AUBURN, FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.
JON E. BUDELMANN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (AMANDA L. CASSELMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, DEJOSEPH, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree ( Penal Law § 120.05 [3 ] ) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (§ 265.02[1] ). Defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal with respect to both the conviction and sentence encompasses his contention that the sentence imposed is unduly harsh and severe (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ; People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 737, 675 N.Y.S.2d 327, 698 N.E.2d 46 [1998] ; cf. People v. Maracle, 19 N.Y.3d 925, 928, 950 N.Y.S.2d 498, 973 N.E.2d 1272 [2012] ).
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.