From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Knapper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 6, 1990
168 A.D.2d 234 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

December 6, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County, Vincent Vitale, J.


The complainants, who had been robbed by defendant, separately viewed books of photographs when one complainant yelled out, "That's him", causing the other complainant to enter the room and confirm the identification. Situations that are not the result of improper conduct by law enforcement officials do not warrant suppression or violate due process. (People v. Shepard, 162 A.D.2d 226. ) Furthermore, the court found that there was an independent source for such identification, with which we are in agreement.

The introduction into evidence of a pen that was similar to the one used in the crime was not an abuse of the trials court's discretion. A facsimile or model is admissible in evidence to assist the jury where it is relevant to a matter at issue and "fairly represents" the items it seeks to symbolize. (People v. Del Vermo, 192 N.Y. 470, 483.)

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Ellerin and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Knapper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 6, 1990
168 A.D.2d 234 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Knapper

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HAROLD KNAPPER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 6, 1990

Citations

168 A.D.2d 234 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
562 N.Y.S.2d 122