From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kirzoncic

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 4, 2013
112 A.D.3d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-12-4

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Robert M. KIRZONCIC, Jr., appellant.

Defazio & Zeidan, LLP, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Anthony M. Defazio of counsel), for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.


Defazio & Zeidan, LLP, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Anthony M. Defazio of counsel), for appellant. William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed July 18, 2013, on the ground that the amended sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the amended sentence is affirmed.

The amended sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. ENG, P.J., DILLON, BALKIN, COHEN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Kirzoncic

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 4, 2013
112 A.D.3d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Kirzoncic

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Robert M. KIRZONCIC, Jr., appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 4, 2013

Citations

112 A.D.3d 651 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
112 A.D.3d 651
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 8099

Citing Cases

Kirzoncic v. New York

Following a direct appeal, the Second Department affirmed Petitioner's conviction on December 4, 2013. People…