From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kirkland

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Feb 8, 2018
58 Misc. 3d 154 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)

Opinion

2016–288 W CR

02-08-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael KIRKLAND, Appellant.

John R. Lewis, for appellant. Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).


John R. Lewis, for appellant.

Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).

PRESENT: JERRY GARGUILO, J.P., ANTHONY MARANO, TERRY JANE RUDERMAN, JJ.

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California (386 US 738 [1967] ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id. ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v. Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v. Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

GARGUILO, J.P., MARANO and RUDERMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Kirkland

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Feb 8, 2018
58 Misc. 3d 154 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
Case details for

People v. Kirkland

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael KIRKLAND…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.

Date published: Feb 8, 2018

Citations

58 Misc. 3d 154 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
95 N.Y.S.3d 125