From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kinsler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 17, 2021
192 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2018–09081 S.C.I. No. 10137/18

03-17-2021

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Derrick KINSLER, appellant.

Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Dalourny Nemorin of counsel), for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnnette Traill and William H. Branigan of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.


Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Dalourny Nemorin of counsel), for appellant.

Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnnette Traill and William H. Branigan of counsel; Victoria Randall on the memorandum), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Suzanne J. Melendez, J., at plea; Eugene M. Guarino, J., at sentence), imposed June 25, 2018, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

RIVERA, J.P., HINDS–RADIX, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Kinsler

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 17, 2021
192 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Kinsler

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Derrick Kinsler…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Mar 17, 2021

Citations

192 A.D.3d 913 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 8248
140 N.Y.S.3d 710