From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kingsley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

May, 1916.


Judgment of conviction affirmed, the court finding no prejudicial error calling for a reversal of the conviction under section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. All concurred, except Kellogg, P.J., who dissented in memorandum, in which Howard, J., concurred.


It was reversible error to receive, over the defendant's objection, the evidence of Mrs. May that her sister, the complainant, after she discovered her pregnancy, two months after the alleged offense, stated to her that the defendant was responsible for her condition. ( Baccio v. People, 41 N.Y. 265; People v. Clemons, 37 Hun, 580; People v. O'Sullivan, 104 N.Y. 481; People v. Friedman, 139 App. Div. 795. ) Howard, J., concurred.


Summaries of

People v. Kingsley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

People v. Kingsley

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . DELL KINGSLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1916

Citations

173 App. Div. 985 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
158 N.Y.S. 1125