From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1994
203 A.D.2d 199 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

April 28, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Clifford Scott, J.).


In light of the fact that an experienced officer spotted defendant in a high crime area at 3:45 A.M. holding what appeared to be money and a crack vial, probable cause existed for the officer to arrest defendant. (People v McRay, 51 N.Y.2d 594; People v Shaw, 193 A.D.2d 390 [1st Dept].) Additionally, the officer's testimony was not manifestly untrue or contrary to common experience and so the IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in admitting into evidence the recovered drugs and the statements of defendant (People v Prochilo, 41 N.Y.2d 759, 761; People v Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86, 88).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Carro, Wallach and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1994
203 A.D.2d 199 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN KING, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1994

Citations

203 A.D.2d 199 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 853

Citing Cases

People v. Whitehead

Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The experienced arresting officer's observation of…