From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 4, 1995
214 A.D.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

April 4, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Frank Torres, J.).


While a trial court's refusal of a defendant's request for a jury instruction that a prior inconsistent statement may be used for impeachment purposes only and is not evidence of the truth of the prior statement is generally inconsequential, where, as here, the People's case rested on the credibility of a single, significantly impeached witness, such refusal constitutes reversible error.

We have considered the defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 4, 1995
214 A.D.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DARRYL KING, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 4, 1995

Citations

214 A.D.2d 307 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 431