From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 1994
209 A.D.2d 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 10, 1994

Appeal from the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Nicandri, J.).


Defendant was sentenced to definite terms of imprisonment of 365 days for each of his convictions of rape in the third degree and sodomy in the third degree, with the sentences to run consecutively. On appeal, defendant argues that consecutive sentences were unauthorized because both offenses were essentially one continuous act. A review of the minutes of the plea, however, supports the view that the offenses for which defendant was convicted involved separate or disparate acts. In addition, defendant's claim that the sentences were harsh and excessive is rejected and we find no reason to disturb the sentences imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P.J., White, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 10, 1994
209 A.D.2d 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES KING, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 797 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 598

Citing Cases

People v. Willard

Furthermore, they have not demonstrated that this information, beyond that already possessed by October 1993,…

People v. White

We disagree. Although the precise time sequence of the acts in question is not clear from the victim's…