From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1985
481 N.E.2d 541 (N.Y. 1985)

Opinion

Argued April 26, 1985

Decided June 4, 1985

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, Alexander Chananau, J.

Karen Goldstein and William E. Hellerstein for appellant.

Mario Merola, District Attorney ( Kevin Lubin and Steven P. Kartagener of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The defendant, approached by a police officer for a gambling violation, fled to a nearby store and refused to come out until the officer had pried the door open. The officer then frisked the defendant and found a loaded handgun. Under the circumstances we agree with the courts below that the frisk of the defendant did not violate his constitutional rights. Although the fact that a person has been stopped for a violation does not ordinarily justify a frisk ( People v St. Clair, 54 N.Y.2d 900), a limited pat down for concealed weapons was reasonable in light of the defendant's uncooperative and suspicious conduct after he had been ordered to stop by the officer.

Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges JASEN, MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE and ALEXANDER concur; Judge TITONE taking no part.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.


Summaries of

People v. King

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 4, 1985
481 N.E.2d 541 (N.Y. 1985)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS KING, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 4, 1985

Citations

481 N.E.2d 541 (N.Y. 1985)
481 N.E.2d 541
492 N.Y.S.2d 1

Citing Cases

People v. Muhammad

Even assuming, however, that defendant carried an open beer bottle or was drinking beer, the officer would…

People v. Tidwell

Such information given by citizens is deemed highly reliable and may be acted upon by the police (People v…