From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 24, 2019
168 A.D.3d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

8204 Ind. 2612/14, 178/14

01-24-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kryzie KING, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (John Loran Palmer of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (R. Jeannie Campbell–Urban of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (John Loran Palmer of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (R. Jeannie Campbell–Urban of counsel), for respondent.

Sweeny, J.P., Tom, Kahn, Oing, Singh, JJ.

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. King

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jan 24, 2019
168 A.D.3d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kryzie KING…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 24, 2019

Citations

168 A.D.3d 584 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
168 A.D.3d 584