In People v. King, 41 Misc3d 1237, 983 NYS2d 205 [Bethlehem Town Court 2013], the Justice Court, citing People v. Mion, found the amount of liquid assets reported by Mr. King sustained an ability to pay for counsel. His expenses were not such as to undermine this ability.
Summary of this case from People v. LamontNo. XX2013.
2013-11-27
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, v. Jared KING, Defendant.
This shall constitute the Decision and Order of the Court.
In People v. King, 41 Misc3d 1237, 983 NYS2d 205 [Bethlehem Town Court 2013], the Justice Court, citing People v. Mion, found the amount of liquid assets reported by Mr. King sustained an ability to pay for counsel. His expenses were not such as to undermine this ability.
Summary of this case from People v. LamontFull title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, v. Jared KING, Defendant.
Court:Justice Court, Town of Bethlehem, Albany County.
Date published: Nov 27, 2013
][c] [court required to appoint counsel at arraignment before proceeding if defendant is financially unable…
People v. Rankinrgument, within the context of a defendant's financial eligibility determination, finds support in both…