From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 23, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

2014-06219.

03-23-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Christopher KING, appellant.

Marianne Karas, Thornwood, N.Y., for appellant. James A. McCarty, Acting District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Adrienne M. Chapoulie and Steven A. Bender of counsel), for respondent.


Marianne Karas, Thornwood, N.Y., for appellant.

James A. McCarty, Acting District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Adrienne M. Chapoulie and Steven A. Bender of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered November 4, 2013, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. By decision and order dated June 17, 2015, this Court remitted the matter to the County Court, Westchester County, for a hearing on the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, for which the defendant would be appointed new counsel, and for a new determination of the motion thereafter, and the appeal was held in abeyance in the interim (see People v. King, 129 A.D.3d 992, 12 N.Y.S.3d 151). The County Court has filed its report.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

In a prior decision and order, this Court concluded that the defendant's right to counsel was adversely affected when his attorney took a position adverse to his on his pro se motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see People v. King, 129 A.D.3d 992, 12 N.Y.S.3d 151). The matter was remitted to the County Court for a hearing on the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, for which the defendant would be appointed new counsel, and for a new determination of the motion thereafter. At the hearing upon remittitur, the defendant, through his new counsel, withdrew his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. Since that motion has been withdrawn, the defendant's contentions in connection with that motion have been rendered academic. Upon our review of the defendant's brief on appeal, we find no other basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, ROMAN, SGROI and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. King

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 23, 2016
137 A.D.3d 1165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Christopher KING, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 23, 2016

Citations

137 A.D.3d 1165 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2111
26 N.Y.S.3d 874

Citing Cases

People v. King

Judge: Decision Reported Below: 2d Dept: 137 AD3d 1165 (Westchester)…