From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. King

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 17, 2015
129 A.D.3d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-06-17

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Christopher KING, appellant.

Marianne Karas, Thornwood, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Adrienne M. Chapoulie and Steven A. Bender of counsel), for respondent.



Marianne Karas, Thornwood, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Adrienne M. Chapoulie and Steven A. Bender of counsel), for respondent.
, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, SHERI S. ROMAN, SANDRA L. SGROI, and SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, JJ.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Zambelli, J.), rendered November 4, 2013, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the matter is remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, for a hearing on the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, for which the defendant shall be appointed new counsel, and for a new determination of the motion thereafter, and the appeal is held in abeyance pending receipt of the County Court's report, which shall be filed with all convenient speed.

At sentencing, before the defendant was given an opportunity to present his pro se motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, defense counsel made remarks in response to the prosecutor's statements that the defendant was not entitled to withdraw his plea. Defense counsel was aware of the substance of the claims being advanced by the defendant, and expressed his opinion that the claims being advanced by the defendant did not provide a legal ground for the withdrawal of his plea. Defense counsel then stated that there was no reason why sentencing shouldn't occur that day.

The defendant's right to counsel was adversely affected when his attorney took a position adverse to his ( see People v. Mitchell, 21 N.Y.3d 964, 967, 970 N.Y.S.2d 919, 993 N.E.2d 405; People v. Armstead, 126 A.D.3d 805, 806, 5 N.Y.S.3d 260; People v. Graves, 95 A.D.3d 1034, 1035, 943 N.Y.S.2d 593; People v. Fully, 90 A.D.3d 1071, 934 N.Y.S.2d 832). The County Court should have assigned a different attorney to represent the defendant before it determined the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty ( see People v. Armstead, 126 A.D.3d at 806, 5 N.Y.S.3d 260; People v. Barr, 116 A.D.3d 1061, 1062, 983 N.Y.S.2d 875; People v. Duart, 113 A.D.3d 788, 789, 978 N.Y.S.2d 369). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the County Court, Westchester County, for a hearing on the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea of guilty, for which the defendant shall be appointed new counsel, and for a new determination of the motion thereafter. We hold the appeal in abeyance pending receipt of the County Court's report. We express no opinion as to the merits of the defendant's motion, and we decide no other issues at this time.


Summaries of

People v. King

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jun 17, 2015
129 A.D.3d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. King

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Christopher KING, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 17, 2015

Citations

129 A.D.3d 992 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
129 A.D.3d 992
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5209