From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kimmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 31, 1996
227 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Summary

considering appeal that was not perfected until approximately eight years after filing

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Glen

Opinion

May 31, 1996

Appeal from the Niagara County Court, DiFlorio, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Fallon, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his due process and equal protection rights were violated by the nearly eight-year delay between the filing of his notice of appeal and the perfection of the appeal. The delay in the perfection of the appeal is in large part attributable to defendant's failure to proceed pro se or to request assigned counsel ( see, People v. Gonzalez, 184 A.D.2d 525, 526, lv denied 80 N.Y.2d 904; cf., Simmons v. Reynolds, 898 F.2d 865).


Summaries of

People v. Kimmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 31, 1996
227 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

considering appeal that was not perfected until approximately eight years after filing

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Glen
Case details for

People v. Kimmons

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. OLIVER KIMMONS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 31, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 984 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 449

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Glen

Under this rule, an avenue of direct appeal from appellant's 1977 convictions remains open to him. Were the…

People v. Moore

Defendant further contends that his rights to due process and equal protection were violated by the nearly…