From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kimmel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 1961
13 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Opinion

March 27, 1961


Appeal by defendant from an order of the County Court, Kings County, dated September 18, 1959, denying, after a hearing, his coram nobis application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered May 11, 1936, convicting him, after a jury trial, of murder in the first degree and sentencing him to death. The judgment of conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals ( People v. Scata, 272 N.Y. 602). Thereafter, the Governor commuted defendant's sentence to life imprisonment. The only ground for relief urged in this court is that the trial court gave supplemental instructions to the jury on three occasions while defendant was absent from the courtroom, in violation of the rule set forth in Maurer v. People ( 43 N.Y. 1). Order affirmed. Assuming that defendant established his absence from the courtroom, as alleged, and that the doctrine of Maurer v. People ( supra) is applicable, we are of the opinion that the error may not be asserted as a basis for relief by way of a coram nobis application. ( People v. Shapiro, 3 N.Y.2d 203.) Nolan, P.J., Beldock, Ughetta, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Kimmel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 27, 1961
13 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)
Case details for

People v. Kimmel

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SAMUEL KIMMEL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 27, 1961

Citations

13 A.D.2d 549 (N.Y. App. Div. 1961)

Citing Cases

People v. Cunningham

Thus, if a defendant failed to pursue direct appellate procedures for review of appealable claims, he could…

People v. Bofill

And, this view prevails even in a murder case. ( People v. Kimmel, 13 A.D.2d 549.) These citations clearly…