From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kimbro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1995
220 A.D.2d 690 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 23, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence regarding the fifth count of grand larceny in the fourth degree was not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245), and, in any event, are without merit (see, People v Cappetta, 86 A.D.2d 876, 877). Altman, J.P., Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Kimbro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1995
220 A.D.2d 690 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Kimbro

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. VINCENT KIMBRO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 23, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 690 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 980