Opinion
October 23, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence regarding the fifth count of grand larceny in the fourth degree was not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Udzinski, 146 A.D.2d 245), and, in any event, are without merit (see, People v Cappetta, 86 A.D.2d 876, 877). Altman, J.P., Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.