From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kilpatrick

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 29, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1183 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-29-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Tamisha L. KILPATRICK, appellant.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Croce of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Cicale of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Alfred J. Croce of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Efman, J.), imposed November 6, 2015, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.The defendant's valid waiver of her right to appeal precludes appellate review of her contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ).

ENG, P.J., AUSTIN, ROMAN, HINDS–RADIX and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Kilpatrick

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 29, 2017
148 A.D.3d 1183 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Kilpatrick

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Tamisha L. KILPATRICK, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 29, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 1183 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
148 A.D.3d 1183

Citing Cases

People v. Dietz

The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see People v Bryant, 28…

People v. Dietz

The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see People v Bryant, 28…