People v. Kiesel

Full title: THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BRIAN KIESEL, Appellant

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 21, 1994

202 A.D.2d 607 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

610 N.Y.S.2d 823

Opinion

March 21, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Mogil, J.).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606).

We have examined the contentions raised by the defendant in his pro se brief and find them to be frivolous (see generally, People v. Kazepis, 101 A.D.2d 816). Mangano, P.J., Balletta, O'Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.