From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Khan

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 3, 2015
125 A.D.3d 433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

02-03-2015

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mohammed KHAN, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), and White & Case LLP, New York (C. Kelly Newman of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Eleanor J. Ostrow of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jan Hoth of counsel), and White & Case LLP, New York (C. Kelly Newman of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Eleanor J. Ostrow of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene D. Goldberg, J.), entered on or about May 22, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level one sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art. 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly designated defendant a sexually violent offender, since he was convicted of sexual abuse in the first degree, an enumerated sexually violent offense (see Correction Law § 168–a[3][a] ; [7][b] ). The court properly determined that it lacked discretion to do otherwise (see People v. Bullock, 125 A.D.3d 1, 997 N.Y.S.2d 396 [1st Dept.2014] ). Defendant asserts that although an element of the crime of which he was convicted (Penal Law § 130.65[1] ) is forcible compulsion, he committed the underlying crime in a manner that was not actually violent, within the general sense of that term. He then argues that the court should have considered his underlying conduct in determining whether to adjudicate him a sexually violent offender. We reject that argument for reasons similar to those set forth in Bullock. Regardless of the underlying facts, defendant is a sexually violent offender simply because he has been convicted of one of the enumerated crimes, and thus meets the statutory definition. In any event, the record establishes that defendant's conduct can be fairly described as violent.

FRIEDMAN, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, RICHTER, GISCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Khan

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 3, 2015
125 A.D.3d 433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Khan

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Mohammed KHAN…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 3, 2015

Citations

125 A.D.3d 433 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
998 N.Y.S.2d 889
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 829

Citing Cases

Khan v. Annucci

He was sentenced to an aggregate determinate term of imprisonment of three years plus a period of…