Opinion
No. 5189.
February 5, 2009.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles J. Tejada, J.), rendered June 28, 2007, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony drug offender, to a term of 3½ years, unanimously affirmed.
Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Charlotte E. Fishman of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349). There is no basis for disturbing the jury's determinations concerning credibility, including its evaluation of minor inconsistencies in testimony.
The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's mistrial motion based on a summation remark by the prosecutor that allegedly shifted the burden of proof, because the curative action taken by the court during the summation was sufficient to prevent any prejudice. Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find that none of the actions by the prosecutor of which defendant complains on appeal deprived him of a fair trial.