From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kenneth Franklin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 1996
232 A.D.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 21, 1996.

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Mastro, J.), both rendered July 8, 1993, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree under Indictment No. 10835/92 and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree under Indictment No. 8644/92, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. The appeals bring up for review the denial under Indictment No. 10835/92, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Before: Mangano, J.P., Rosenblatt, Sullivan and Hart, JJ.


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant's motion to suppress identification testimony ( see, People v Coleman, 214 AD2d 619). The defendant's right to appellate review of his remaining contention regarding an alleged violation of his right to testify before the Grand Jury was forfeited by his plea of guilty ( see, People v Ferrara, 99 AD2d 257).


Summaries of

People v. Kenneth Franklin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 21, 1996
232 A.D.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Kenneth Franklin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENNETH FRANKLIN, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 21, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 986

Citing Cases

People v. Witherspoon

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. By pleading guilty the defendant forfeited appellate review of his…

People v. Tower

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By pleading guilty, defendant waived his contention that he was…