From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kennerly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted January 14, 2000

February 24, 2000

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cooperman, J.), rendered October 21, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree and jostling, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Dawn E. Scott of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Nicole Beder, and Nicole H. Baker of counsel), for respondent.

CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ANITA R. FLORIO and ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court's Sandoval ruling was a provident exercise of discretion. The court balanced the relevant factors and formulated an appropriate compromise (see, People v. Walker, 83 N.Y.2d 455, 458-459 ; People v. Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371 ).


Summaries of

People v. Kennerly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Kennerly

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. MAURICE KENNERLY, appellant. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 543 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 489