Opinion
571049/18
03-30-2020
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Bahaati E. Pitt, J.), rendered August 21, 2018, affirmed.
Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal. The court's oral colloquy, taken together with the written waiver, which defendant discussed with counsel, signed in open court and acknowledged understanding, established that the waiver was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see People v. Bryant , 28 NY3d 1094, 1096 [2016] ; see also People v. Thomas , ––– NY3d ––––, 2019 NY Slip Op 08545 [2019] ). To the extent that defendant's constitutional challenge to Correction Law § 168-f(4) survives his guilty plea and waiver of appeal, it is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, defendant's claim that Correction Law § 168-f(4), which requires a sex offender to register within 10 days after any change of address, is unconstitutional with respect to transient or homeless individuals, is unavailing (see People v. Stedge , 135 AD3d 1170 [2016] ; People v. Herman , 102 AD3d 811 [2013], lv denied 20 NY3d 1099 [2013] ; see also People v. Lanham , 177 AD3d 637 [2019] ).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.