Opinion
July 12, 1985
Appeal from the Monroe County Court, Mark, J.
Present — Hancock, Jr., J.P., Doerr, Denman, O'Donnell and Pine, JJ.
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant's contention that the court's charge on intoxication was erroneous was not preserved for review since there was no exception or request (CPL 470.05). In view of the strong evidence of guilt, there is no reason to reach the issue in the interests of justice. In any event, the charge, taken as a whole, would not constitute reversible error ( see, People v. Mitchell, 72 A.D.2d 920). The other claimed errors were either not preserved for review or are without merit.