From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Kendall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1998
255 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 30, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Katz, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

It was improper to permit the People's rebuttal witness to repeat the testimony that he had given on the People's direct case ( see, People v. Brown, 126 A.D.2d 657; People v. Gabriel, 241 A.D.2d 835). However, this error was harmless under the circumstances of this case ( see, People v. Alston, 158 A.D.2d 607; People v. Brown, supra).

The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review, and we decline to reach it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see, People v. Davis, 248 A.D.2d 399).

O'Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Kendall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 30, 1998
255 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Kendall

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILBERFORCE KENDALL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 601 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 874

Citing Cases

People v. Sulayao

Likewise, the trial court providently exercised its discretion in allowing an expert witness to shake a doll…